In Head Start, I believe that the summary (What needs to be done?) was especially hard hitting given the facts and statistics reported in Current government involvement forward. At first I believed that the essay was kind of boring due to it's very factual nature and the research supported multiple sides of the issue. It seemed like the writer was undecided. However, when the essay was summarized, the point was driven home: "Privileged children should be the only ones to go to preschool...", "Given these numerous statistics that show the government could end uip making money and benefit society if they fully funded head start...Why is Head Start not already fully funded?"
I think that the essay could have benefited from some more personality when delivering the facts to keep it from losing me as a reader. It seemed to be too long in its present form but with some wit, I would have been engaged from beginning to end, instead of just having a mild revelation at the end of the essay.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment